W6 Child & Family Advocacy

> SHARE Protect the Children on social media and Does Science Argue for God

Ucthdorf: However, when you are confronted with information that is in conflict with the revealed word of God, remember that the blind men in the parable of the elephant would never be able to accurately describe the full truth."

Advocacy Groups

Legal Groups

Think Tanks

Reliable Survey Data

While reading Evaluating Research Quality Download Evaluating Research Quality, ponder the following questions:

  • What do you think it means that all people are entitled to their own opinions but not to their own facts? Can you think of any examples of this in mainstream media or on social media today?
  • Why can statements that begin with “I’ve heard” or “You know, they say” be so dangerous when articulating your point?
  • So far we have learned the importance of having the doctrine in our hearts. Why do you think it is also important to have good science in our minds, mouths, and at our fingertips (typing)? 
 >Schumm’s reluctance to follow the political implications of the science in his own research threatens not only the policies involved but also the science
...those with scientific or evidential reservations must assert them in order to preserve the ability to practice honest science at all. 


  • What critical assessments did Professor Sullins summarize that was the most surprising to you?
  • Do you think that this was a fair assessment? How do you know?
  • What problems have come about because many poorly done studies were taken as credible science?
  • Is it possible to promote good social science while still having love and compassion for gay and lesbian parents and their children? (explain your answer)

*WATCH more grievance studies videos

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FAML 430 Week 9

FAML 430 Week 2

Human Rights